Only once in a great while does a writer come along who defies comparison -- a writer so original he redefines the way we look at the world. Neal Stephenson is such a writer and Snow Crash is such a novel, weaving virtual reality, Sumerian myth, and just about everything in between with a cool, hip cyber-sensibility to bring us the gigantic thriller of the information age. In reality, Hiro Protagonist delivers pizza for Uncle Enzo's Cosa Nostra Inc., but it the Metaverse he's a warrior prince. Plunging headlong into the enigma of a new computer virus that's striking down hackers everywhere, he races along the neon-lit streets on a search-and-destroy mission for the shadowy virtual villain threatening to bring about infocalypse. Snow Crash is a mind-altering romp through a future America so bizarre, so outrageous... you'll recognize it immediately.From the Paperback edition.
My girlfriend lent me this to read on the plane when I had a long flight. Overall entertaining, I didn't feel like I was slogging through (mostly), but it takes itself Way too seriously for a book whose main character is named Hiro Protagonist.
Boy-o-boy am I surprised I didn't like this more. Its rating here on Goodreads is very good. People whose opinions usually align with mine gave it 5-stars. 10 years ago I read Stephenson's 'Cryptonomicon' and really liked it: I gave it 5 stars. Esquire put Snow Crash on their list "The 50 Best Sci-Fi Books of All Time"!
Some of the ideas are pretty interesting, and the story outline is good. But the thing is, I just never really got into it. I found the writing to be bland. (Detail: The writing 'voice' of the robot dog felt like a person trying to write in the voice of a robot dog.) I found the protagonist Hiro to be kinda boring, the love interest was unconvincing, and the big bad never felt super menacing. I did like the Aleut assassin Raven, and kinda liked Y.T. I did not like their …
Boy-o-boy am I surprised I didn't like this more. Its rating here on Goodreads is very good. People whose opinions usually align with mine gave it 5-stars. 10 years ago I read Stephenson's 'Cryptonomicon' and really liked it: I gave it 5 stars. Esquire put Snow Crash on their list "The 50 Best Sci-Fi Books of All Time"!
Some of the ideas are pretty interesting, and the story outline is good. But the thing is, I just never really got into it. I found the writing to be bland. (Detail: The writing 'voice' of the robot dog felt like a person trying to write in the voice of a robot dog.) I found the protagonist Hiro to be kinda boring, the love interest was unconvincing, and the big bad never felt super menacing. I did like the Aleut assassin Raven, and kinda liked Y.T. I did not like their relationship though.
For me it's a middling 2+, rounded up to 3. For context: 1 star is 'did not finish', and 2 is 'I thought about putting it down but soldiered on', so 3 is the 'right' rating for me for this book even if it feels generous.
As for liking Cryptonomicon but not really liking this one: Cryptonomicon was published around 7 years after Snow Crash. I'm thinking, hoping, that it means that I like newer Stephenson books so I can maybe try another one some day.
I will admit it took a while for me to warm up to it, but it's actually pretty entertaining and has some cool ideas re: what it means to be a "hacker".